It's a REALLY common attitude amongst the male MacGyver fan contingent -- which is an entitled minority and probably always has been.
I realised there's a good parallel here: were you in Doctor Who fandom pre-reboot? (I was, having started in 1982.) There was a strong fannish subgroup, almost all male, that seemed to think that what made the show Awe-Sum was the monsters. Mind you, they meant the Old Who monsters.
Think about that for a moment . . . now think of MacGyver. Strong subgroup that believes that what made the show Awe-sum was the explosions, and to a lesser extent, the MacGyverisms themselves. Not the character, not the stories, not the charm, not the values system, not the actor who defined the role.
I've also been thinking about some of the other major franchises -- Star Wars, Star Trek, Who, etc. MacGyver is the ONLY ONE I can think of for which, when reboots and comics etc. are bruited, there has been any attempt to isolate the character from the actor, and deny the identification between them. But that's what they keep trying to do with Mac. When the comic book project was in development, and the creators were hanging out on MacGyverOnline and asking us for comments, they were insanely insistent that MacGyver COULD NOT BE INDENTIFIED WITH RDA.
I shit you not. That's what they insisted. They deliberately designed the comic book so that Mac looked generic and Not Like RDA.
The comic book was weak, but it got a lot more things right than the reboot series. Gahhh. (The creators had shifted from accepting feedback to trying to slap us down when we said things they didn't agree with, so it wasn't exactly a shining moment in fan relations.)
I wasn't there for that from the DW Fandom, but I did hear about it afterwards. Rusty almost made the mistake of bowing to that asshattery, but remembered what the Doctor is SUPPOSED to be before launching (which is a good thing all around, imho).
OMG...really?? But RDA WAS MacGyver and vice versa! I would have been petitioning for his image and input!! Ye gods. And it is sad that they still got more right with the comics than with the reboot. That's just...shitty.
It's like the SGU folks saying they didn't need the old SG1 or Atlantis fans, they were targeting a different audience. Then when the ratings tanked, if became the fans fault for not supporting the franchise.
I remember that kerfluffle!! UGH. The only good thing about that show was the Rush-Young love-hate. The rest was sheer garbage and had nothing to do with Stargate! UGH. Was thrilled when the darned thing sunk, just because the whole debacle was such a slap to the face...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
I realised there's a good parallel here: were you in Doctor Who fandom pre-reboot? (I was, having started in 1982.) There was a strong fannish subgroup, almost all male, that seemed to think that what made the show Awe-Sum was the monsters. Mind you, they meant the Old Who monsters.
Think about that for a moment . . . now think of MacGyver. Strong subgroup that believes that what made the show Awe-sum was the explosions, and to a lesser extent, the MacGyverisms themselves. Not the character, not the stories, not the charm, not the values system, not the actor who defined the role.
I've also been thinking about some of the other major franchises -- Star Wars, Star Trek, Who, etc. MacGyver is the ONLY ONE I can think of for which, when reboots and comics etc. are bruited, there has been any attempt to isolate the character from the actor, and deny the identification between them. But that's what they keep trying to do with Mac. When the comic book project was in development, and the creators were hanging out on MacGyverOnline and asking us for comments, they were insanely insistent that MacGyver COULD NOT BE INDENTIFIED WITH RDA.
I shit you not. That's what they insisted. They deliberately designed the comic book so that Mac looked generic and Not Like RDA.
The comic book was weak, but it got a lot more things right than the reboot series. Gahhh. (The creators had shifted from accepting feedback to trying to slap us down when we said things they didn't agree with, so it wasn't exactly a shining moment in fan relations.)
no subject
OMG...really?? But RDA WAS MacGyver and vice versa! I would have been petitioning for his image and input!! Ye gods. And it is sad that they still got more right with the comics than with the reboot. That's just...shitty.
no subject
no subject
*HUGS*
no subject
no subject
no subject
JacksonFTL!